Technical SEO
How to Write a Reconsideration Request That Gets Reviewed Properly
Google lists exactly three things a good request does. Here’s how to cover each.
A reconsideration request asks Google to review your site after you’ve fixed the problem behind a manual action. If Google agrees the site no longer violates its spam policies, it revokes the action.
Google says a good request explains the exact quality issue, describes the steps you’ve taken to fix it, and documents the outcome of your efforts.
Short answer: A good reconsideration request explains the exact issue on your site, describes the steps you took to fix it, and documents the outcome with evidence, such as spreadsheets of removed links or lists of changed pages. Submit it from the Manual actions report only when the issue is fully fixed, and don’t resubmit before you get a final decision.
Key Takeaways
- Fix everything first; request review only when you’re confident the site complies.
- Explain the issue honestly and specifically.
- Describe every step you took, with dates.
- Attach evidence, such as link-removal logs or lists of fixed pages.
- Don’t resubmit while a request is pending.
A simple structure
- The issue: name the manual action and what caused it, without excuses.
- What you did: the specific fixes, how many pages or links were affected, and when.
- The outcome: what the site looks like now, with links to evidence.
- Prevention: what you’ve changed so it won’t happen again.
Evidence to include
- For link issues: a spreadsheet of links reviewed, removal requests sent, responses, and what was disavowed.
- For content issues: a list of pages removed, rewritten or noindexed.
- For hacked content: what was cleaned and how security was fixed.
- If you recently acquired the site, Google says you can say so and confirm it no longer violates the policies.
An example outline
This is a structure to adapt, not wording to copy. Write in your own words and keep it factual.
- “We received a manual action for [type] on [date], affecting [pages or the whole site].”
- “The cause was [what happened, who did it and when], which broke Google’s policy on [policy].”
- “Between [dates] we [specific actions], covering [number] pages or links. The full list is in the linked document.”
- “We could not remove [number] links after contacting the owners on [dates]; these are included in our disavow file.”
- “To prevent a repeat, we have [process change, such as reviewing all link building and content before it goes live].”
Share evidence through a link to a document anyone with the link can view, and check that the link works before you submit.
After you submit
Google sends a confirmation that the review is in progress and emails you about progress. It says reviews can take some time and that you shouldn’t resubmit before getting a final decision on an outstanding request.
Mistakes to avoid
- Submitting before the clean-up is genuinely complete.
- Blaming a previous agency without showing what’s been fixed.
- Vague statements like “we fixed all issues” with no evidence.
- Ignoring other manual actions on the same site.
For link-related actions, follow our unnatural links recovery guide first.
Frequently asked questions
How long does a reconsideration request take?
Google says reviews can take some time and that you’ll be informed of progress by email.
Can I submit more than one request?
Don’t resubmit before you get a final decision on an outstanding request.
What if my request is rejected?
Read the response carefully, fix what remains, and submit a new request with fuller evidence.
Want a second pair of eyes on your technical SEO?
We review crawling, indexing, rendering and speed issues by hand and give you a prioritized list of fixes, starting with a free manual audit.
Sources
- Search Console Help: Manual actions report
- Google Search Central: Spam policies for Google web search
Last reviewed October 14, 2026.
